patching...
Update: New! Tune in to WPIX11 at 5 p.m. to see Patch's top stories from the tri-state area.
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Hempstead Town Notebook: Election Results

A weekly look-in at news from around the Town of Hempstead.

 

Election Day was this past Tuesday, and there was a total of six elections in the Town of Hempstead. The six elections were swept by the Republican candidates. The results are as follows:

Town Supervisor

Incumbent Republican Kate Murray will serve another two-year team as Town Supervisor as she easily defeated Democratic challenger Gary Port Tuesday for the seat.

Murray captured 66.84 percent of the total vote against the non-incumbent, Port.

Town Clerk

Republican Mark Bonilla retained his position as Hempstead Town Clerk Tuesday after defeating Democrat Steve Anchin.

Bonilla, first elected in 2003, captured 63.12 of the total vote against the non-incumbent, Anchin.

Receiver of Taxes

Republican Donald X. Clavin Jr. won his re-election Tuesday against Democrat Wilton Robinson Jr. for Hempstead Town Receiver of Taxes.

Clavin captured 66.32 percent of the total vote against the non-incumbent, Robinson.

Clavin has served as receiver of taxes since 2001.

2nd Councilmanic District

Incumbent Republican Ed Ambrosino defeated Democratic challenger Patricia Locurcio Tuesday for 2nd district council member.

Ambrosino, first elected in 2003, captured 63.17 percent of the total vote against the non-incumbent, Locurcio.

3rd Councilmanic District

Republican James Darcy retained his position as 3rd district council member Tuesday after defeating Democrat Owen Rumelt.

Darcy, of Valley Stream, captured 68.74 percent of the total vote against the non-incumbent, Rumelt.

5th Councilmanic District

Incumbent Republican Angie Cullin defeated Democratic challenger Claudia Borecky Tuesday for 5th district council member.

Cullin captured 62.06 percent of the total vote against the non-incumbent, Borecky.

Cullin has served the 5th district since her appointment in January 2001 and subsequent election in November 2003.

  • Are you happy with the outcome of the 2011 Town of Hempstead elections?

    (Voting has been closed for this question)
    • Yes
        78 (46%)
    • No (explain in comment section)
        91 (53%)
    Total votes: 169
  • This is not a scientific poll. View Results Vote!
Related Topics: Election 2011, Elections, Town of Hempstead, and Town of Hempstead Notebook

Ramona Gillings

8:01 am on Sunday, November 13, 2011

Since the large majority of residents in Long Island are so unhappy with the costs, taxes and problems here, why do they keep voting for the same politicians in the same political parties over and over?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Donald S Dittmer

9:50 am on Sunday, November 13, 2011

IF you noticed, the Republicans took control only 2 years ago after a long-killing by the Democrats we now have a County Gov't that is moving forward and getting cost's under control - unlike the Fed Gov't.
So before you go mouthing about why we put the ' Good ' people back in office every year it's because of the work they do FOR us, not against us like the dem's did.

Chris Wendt

8:18 am on Sunday, November 13, 2011

...and the answer is we are talking about the Town of Hempstead, the one shining example of how to run a municipality correctly, with costs in line, taxes modest, and services excellent.

Compare the Town of Hempstead with, say almost any school district in the County, and, of course, with the County government itself, which teeters on the brink of fiscal ruination amidst reduced services.

In a word, for the Town, it is about value received for money spent. Hempstead Township is a good value.

Maybe we should eliminate Nassau County altogether, split the Town of Oyster Bay in half at the LIE, and make the Town of Hempstead and the Town of North Hempstead each a new county, each subsuming their respective halves of Oyster Bay?

Reply
Comment_arrow

icarumba

9:24 am on Sunday, November 13, 2011

mr wendt,
unless you can afford to live in a gold coast mansion or a horse farm in brookville/muttontown, nassau county is now essentially queens without the subway, and substandard bus service-which im sure will get worse after 1/1.

your idea has a lot of merit but itll never happen because by doing so, it will change the balance of power and reduce the good ol boy (and girl) politics that is doing so much harm in the end.

JOET*GUITAR

10:36 am on Sunday, November 13, 2011

Ramona Gillings -is 100% correct about you all. All you all do is complain about them all year long-this and that etc-etc--never ending--and then what?-YOU RE-ELECT THEM ALL INTO OFFICE SO THEY CAN CONTINUE TO RIP YOU OFF AND NOT CARE ABOUT THINGS THAT ARE IMPT TO ALL OF US--JUST THEIR POCKETS---ARE YOU ALL IMBALANCED OR WHAT--PLEASE IN 2012-DONT COMPLAIN ABOUT ANYTHING THEY DO CAUSE IT WILL SHOW YOU ARE IMBALANCED TO ME AND RAMONA

Reply

icarumba

10:45 am on Sunday, November 13, 2011

hey donald,
if nassau is such a well run county, then why are is it overseen by NIFA?
you probably work for the county, town or one of the villages- ha.

Reply

Eddie

11:21 am on Sunday, November 13, 2011

Thank God the Republicans retained the County and Town. At least those taxes won't go up so I can hold the line on my tenants' rents.

I have a bunch of happy tenants and they don't even know why.

I send them letters each election day that a vote for a Democrat is a vote for a rent increase.

They're learning.

Reply

JeremyNY

12:05 pm on Sunday, November 13, 2011

Ok--people. We need to think about this for a second. The reason why the Town taxes don't seem to go up is for three reasons...

1) The Town of Hempstead digs into its reserves and continues to borrow tens of millions of dollars. That can't last forever.
2) Special Taxing Districts, controlled by the Town, such as sanitation districts DO raise their taxes. The Town takes the surplus from these districts. So taxes in effect do go up.
3) Fees have increased both in Nassau and the TOH to cover some costs.

Reply

laocoon

1:29 pm on Sunday, November 13, 2011

4) Town also deeply cut spending. Forgot that one, eh?

Reply
Comment_arrow

JeremyNY

3:31 pm on Sunday, November 13, 2011

That's false. Look at the budget. The Town is borrowing tens of millions of dollars to continue its spending. Where did you get the idea that it is cutting spending?

Carol Anthony

2:23 pm on Sunday, November 13, 2011

I have to agree with icarumba, and I actually like Queens! Transportation is a major issue on all of Long Island. LIRR as we all know is designed to get people in and out of the city (not around LI), and it doesn't do that very well. A more efficient bus service or "loop" on the LIRR where you could connect North and South Shore towns with those on the existing East-West lines would be a huge improvement, increase revenue for LIRR, and improve the local economy and commuter's quality of life. I'm surprised it wasn't done a long time ago.

Reply
Comment_arrow

icarumba

4:21 pm on Sunday, November 13, 2011

carol anthony,

it wasnt done because robert moses was not only anti mass transit, he didnt want certain "people" to come to LI and use his beaches and parks.

case in point- why do you think the overpasses on the northern state and southern state parkways are too low to allow buses to safely clear?

all your other comments are addressed in the book "the power broker". a very interesting read indeed.

A. Shaw

3:23 pm on Sunday, November 13, 2011

I'm puzzled. Has everyone forgotten the TOH Wantagh Animal Shelter debacle this past year? That alone was reason to vote people out of office.

Reply

Carol Anthony

4:48 pm on Sunday, November 13, 2011

Yes, the Wantagh animal shelter case was appalling. I'm sure there are cases of abuse and corruption in other agencies that have yet to be discovered. As far as reelecting the officials that are unaware of, ignore, or are even part of the corruption, we need to have more real discussions about specific problems and how to solve them, and not just criticize the people in office we happen not to like.

Reply

icarumba

4:54 pm on Sunday, November 13, 2011

jeremy,
in basically any other area than LI, the "kate machine" would basically be run out of town.

ms anthony,
find me anywhere else in america where there is an animal shelter that not only as multi-million dollar salaries and expenses (when all is added up) but is not even a no-kill shelter.

im VERY surprised that PETA and the other animal rights groups didnt get involved in this sordid mess.

Reply

terry

5:52 pm on Sunday, November 13, 2011

What I find curious is that the DA was asked to investigate the shelter BY the town. Animal abuse was never mentioned. In fact, the only people who made the allegations were individuals banned from it. They said they worked their for 10 years, and never a peep. Suddenly after getting banned the start allegations, something to think about. Also, the Comptroller investigation is only about the $, not abuse.

And Jeremey, that what reserves are for, to use them to help offset raising taxes. But your a big fan of Steve Anchin, guy who ran for clerk. How did that work out. And special districts are NOT controlled by the towns. Since you are in college right now, you should read up on this stuff. And the town can't take surplus from them, thats illegal! Again, you post straight forward lies!

Reply

Merrick7

9:51 pm on Sunday, November 13, 2011

The special taxing districts are reported in the Town budget because they collect the taxes for the districts. They do not touch their collections to offset town taxes if they did they would be violating the law. Considering the TOH is constantly awarded for transparency, I would tread carefully on that charge. However, the animal shelter is a blunder. I think the shelter operations are fine and run decently. The pay is unfair and astronomical, however.

I think it is unfair for any public servant to receive pay above the average for the community it is in. The original reason people went into public service, was despite the low pay they received a guaranteed pension for life and good health benefits. Now it has become guaranteed pay for life, the benefits and high pay. It is an unsustainable system.

Something Kate does not brag about, she is one of the few municipal operations to get employees to contribute to their healthcare. The use of the reserves is fair and standard legal practice to offset taxes and balance a budget. That is the purpose of those funds, not for anything else.

Personally it annoys me that Kate will not spend more than the 40 million dollar parks improvement project, the green energy park, the new Camp ANCHOR, the restored Lido and Point Lookout, the 50 million dollar improvement project. I would prefer more investment in restoring our Town like TOBAY is doing.

Reply

Mike

8:04 am on Monday, November 14, 2011

icarumba

You keep mixing up your school, village, county and town taxes. Town taxes are low and show what a good job Team Kate is doing.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jon L.

9:41 pm on Tuesday, November 15, 2011

Thank you Mr. Deery, please don't dislocate your shoulder patting yourself on the back.

Icarumba makes very good points the first of them is that anyone with a real interest in NYC/LI politics should make Robert Caro's 'The Power Broker' required reading.

Kate's anti-growth, anti-HUB, pro-borrowing, pro-patronage and egomaniacal agenda will come back to haunt the People's Republic of Hempstead.

Borrow and mail, the Team Murray way!

Bill Alderman

10:35 am on Monday, November 14, 2011

Terry,
Is that the same DA who is being sued by her co-op board for a flagrant and illegal violation of her agreement for having a pet, when she signed that she would not? And now she says that teh rules about not having a pet , "Does NOT apply to her!" ? That DA who ...might have her name "FRYED" this time around?

Reply

MeAgain

2:26 pm on Monday, November 14, 2011

doesn't seem like she was informed by the board of the change in policy

Reply

Leave a comment